|
The
exercise transposes the well-know game, Monopoly, into the Montreal
reality with 22 original interpretations of “houses” from 22 firms;
the exhibition questions the place of architecture in the world of the
residential real estate market.
The
delimitation of personal space in physical form establishes the
interrelation of self and other, interior and exterior, family and
community, nature and culture. Dwelling is not a solitary act: it is a
social one. Like a face, housing is the representation of self and the
intermediary in interpersonal relationships. A house is a portrait of
the occupant – either the mask, the image of self or the third skin.
The face can be masculine or feminine, extroverted or introverted. This
anthropomorphism invites us to transgress the limits of the face to
enter into the intimate realm of the interior where the notion of
difference is circumvented and dissolved. Masculine and feminine
combine; birth, life and death are played out. The act of staying is
alive, changing; it demands care (maintenance), love. Roots are
established, hope rises from the maculate ground of home, an exuberant
green canopy shelters and teases the air with possibilities. Grow green
architecture! If housing is the image of self, its value is very
personal, hence invaluable. But this face cannot exist without being put
forward by its context: the image of self must be acknowledged by the
other, and the architect is the intermediary of the dialogue. The
architecture of the face is little affected by style: a well-fitted
dwelling resists the tyrannies of fashion. Its true value is elucidated
by intent and tested by time: its value is only confirmed with its
durability and viability.
|